You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing ecological infrastructure investments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1802883116 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wiktor Adamowicz, Laura Calderon-Etter, Alicia Entem, Eli P. Fenichel, Jefferson S. Hall, Patrick Lloyd-Smith, Fred L. Ogden, Jason A. Regina, Mani Rouhi Rad, Robert F. Stallard |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 28% |
| Mexico | 2 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 44% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 116 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 20% |
| Researcher | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 14% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 21 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 24 | 21% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 16 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 13% |
| Engineering | 8 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 32 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,003,636
of 25,635,728 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#15,411
of 103,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,141
of 447,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#311
of 956 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,635,728 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 956 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.