↓ Skip to main content

Argumentation Theory for Mathematical Argument

Overview of attention for article published in Argumentation, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Argumentation Theory for Mathematical Argument
Published in
Argumentation, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10503-018-9474-x
Authors

Joseph Corneli, Ursula Martin, Dave Murray-Rust, Gabriela Rino Nesin, Alison Pease

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 5 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 13 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 6 19%
Computer Science 3 10%
Linguistics 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Philosophy 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 14 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2020.
All research outputs
#13,387,125
of 23,302,246 outputs
Outputs from Argumentation
#94
of 287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,686
of 438,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Argumentation
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,302,246 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 287 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.