↓ Skip to main content

Mediation of the Relationship Between Endovascular Therapy and Functional Outcome by Follow-up Infarct Volume in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Neurology, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
68 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mediation of the Relationship Between Endovascular Therapy and Functional Outcome by Follow-up Infarct Volume in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published in
JAMA Neurology, February 2019
DOI 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.3661
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna M. M. Boers, Ivo G. H. Jansen, Scott Brown, Hester F. Lingsma, Ludo F. M. Beenen, Thomas G. Devlin, Luis San Román, Ji-Hoe Heo, Marc Ribó, Mohammed A. Almekhlafi, David S. Liebeskind, Jeanne Teitelbaum, Patricia Cuadras, Richard du Mesnil de Rochemont, Marine Beaumont, Martin M. Brown, Albert J. Yoo, Geoffrey A. Donnan, Jean Louis Mas, Catherine Oppenheim, Richard J. Dowling, Thierry Moulin, Nelly Agrinier, Demetrius K. Lopes, Lucía Aja Rodríguez, Kars C. J. Compagne, Fahad S. Al-Ajlan, Jeremy Madigan, Gregory W. Albers, Sebastien Soize, Jordi Blasco, Stephen M. Davis, Raul G. Nogueira, Antoni Dávalos, Bijoy K. Menon, Aad van der Lugt, Keith W. Muir, Yvo B. W. E. M. Roos, Phil White, Peter J. Mitchell, Andrew M. Demchuk, Wim H. van Zwam, Tudor G. Jovin, Robert J. van Oostenbrugge, Diederik W. J. Dippel, Bruce C. V. Campbell, Francis Guillemin, Serge Bracard, Michael D. Hill, Mayank Goyal, Henk A. Marquering, Charles B. L. M. Majoie

Abstract

The positive treatment effect of endovascular therapy (EVT) is assumed to be caused by the preservation of brain tissue. It remains unclear to what extent the treatment-related reduction in follow-up infarct volume (FIV) explains the improved functional outcome after EVT in patients with acute ischemic stroke. To study whether FIV mediates the relationship between EVT and functional outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Patient data from 7 randomized multicenter trials were pooled. These trials were conducted between December 2010 and April 2015 and included 1764 patients randomly assigned to receive either EVT or standard care (control). Follow-up infarct volume was assessed on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging after stroke onset. Mediation analysis was performed to examine the potential causal chain in which FIV may mediate the relationship between EVT and functional outcome. A total of 1690 patients met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-five additional patients were excluded, resulting in a total of 1665 patients, including 821 (49.3%) in the EVT group and 844 (50.7%) in the control group. Data were analyzed from January to June 2017. The 90-day functional outcome via the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Among 1665 patients, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 68 (57-76) years, and 781 (46.9%) were female. The median (IQR) time to FIV measurement was 30 (24-237) hours. The median (IQR) FIV was 41 (14-120) mL. Patients in the EVT group had significantly smaller FIVs compared with patients in the control group (median [IQR] FIV, 33 [11-99] vs 51 [18-134] mL; P = .007) and lower mRS scores at 90 days (median [IQR] score, 3 [1-4] vs 4 [2-5]). Follow-up infarct volume was a predictor of functional outcome (adjusted common odds ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.39-0.54; P < .001). Follow-up infarct volume partially mediated the relationship between treatment type with mRS score, as EVT was still significantly associated with functional outcome after adjustment for FIV (adjusted common odds ratio, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.52-3.21; P < .001). Treatment-reduced FIV explained 12% (95% CI, 1-19) of the relationship between EVT and functional outcome. In this analysis, follow-up infarct volume predicted functional outcome; however, a reduced infarct volume after treatment with EVT only explained 12% of the treatment benefit. Follow-up infarct volume as measured on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging is not a valid proxy for estimating treatment effect in phase II and III trials of acute ischemic stroke.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 135 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Student > Postgraduate 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 32 24%
Unknown 39 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 36%
Neuroscience 12 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Engineering 3 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 1%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 51 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2021.
All research outputs
#745,199
of 25,502,817 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Neurology
#933
of 5,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,260
of 456,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Neurology
#32
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,502,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.