You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evolution of adverse changes in stored RBCs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.0708160104 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elliott Bennett-Guerrero, Tim H. Veldman, Allan Doctor, Marilyn J. Telen, Thomas L. Ortel, T. Scott Reid, Melissa A. Mulherin, Hongmei Zhu, Raymond D. Buck, Robert M. Califf, Timothy J. McMahon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 3% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 251 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 17% |
| Researcher | 44 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 7% |
| Other | 63 | 23% |
| Unknown | 51 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 98 | 36% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 14% |
| Engineering | 19 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 28 | 10% |
| Unknown | 62 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,586,605
of 24,625,114 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#21,184
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,196
of 79,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#66
of 583 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,625,114 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 583 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.