| Title |
How are gender inequalities facing India’s one million ASHAs being addressed? Policy origins and adaptations for the world’s largest all-female community health worker programme
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Resources for Health, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12960-018-0338-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R. Ved, K. Scott, G. Gupta, O. Ummer, S. Singh, A. Srivastava, A. S. George |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 14% |
| India | 6 | 8% |
| South Africa | 6 | 8% |
| United States | 4 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 4 | 5% |
| Canada | 3 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| Kenya | 1 | 1% |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 35 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 48 | 61% |
| Scientists | 15 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 286 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 286 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 43 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 53 | 19% |
| Unknown | 101 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 47 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 12% |
| Psychology | 7 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 40 | 14% |
| Unknown | 116 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2022.
All research outputs
#614,235
of 25,711,194 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#27
of 1,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,954
of 448,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,270 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.