↓ Skip to main content

Real-World Cost Effectiveness of Mandatory Folic Acid Fortification of Bread-Making Flour in Australia

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Real-World Cost Effectiveness of Mandatory Folic Acid Fortification of Bread-Making Flour in Australia
Published in
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s40258-018-00454-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sopany Saing, Phil Haywood, Naomi van der Linden, Kathleen Manipis, Elena Meshcheriakova, Stephen Goodall

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Other 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Other 12 22%
Unknown 15 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 8 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Psychology 4 7%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 14 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2019.
All research outputs
#3,735,233
of 25,302,890 outputs
Outputs from Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
#172
of 840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,718
of 450,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,302,890 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.