| Title |
Corruption and Representations of Scholarly Output
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Academic Ethics, March 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10805-009-9071-6 |
| Authors |
Robert Liebler |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 50% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 25% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 2 | 50% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2019.
All research outputs
#3,952,110
of 23,122,481 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Academic Ethics
#59
of 237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,111
of 94,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Academic Ethics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,122,481 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 237 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them