↓ Skip to main content

Gallstones and incident colorectal cancer in a large pan‐European cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Cancer, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gallstones and incident colorectal cancer in a large pan‐European cohort study
Published in
International Journal of Cancer, January 2019
DOI 10.1002/ijc.32090
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heather A Ward, Neil Murphy, Elisabete Weiderpass, Michael F Leitzmann, Elom Aglago, Marc J Gunter, Heinz Freisling, Mazda Jenab, Marie‐Christine Boutron‐Ruault, Gianluca Severi, Franck Carbonnel, Tilman Kühn, Rudolf Kaaks, Heiner Boeing, Anne Tjønneland, Anja Olsen, Kim Overvad, Susana Merino, Raul Zamora‐Ros, Miguel Rodríguez‐Barranco, Miren Dorronsoro, Maria‐Dolores Chirlaque, Aurelio Barricarte, Aurora Perez‐Cornago, Antonia Trichopoulou, Christina Bamia, Pagona Lagiou, Giovanna Masala, Sara Grioni, Rosario Tumino, Carlotta Sacerdote, Amalia Mattiello, Bas Bueno‐de‐Mesquita, Roel Vermeulen, Carla Van Gils, Hanna Nyström, Martin Rutegård, Dagfinn Aune, Elio Riboli, Amanda J Cross

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 20%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Other 3 5%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 24 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 26 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2020.
All research outputs
#7,538,708
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Cancer
#4,599
of 12,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,290
of 450,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Cancer
#93
of 233 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,349 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 233 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.