↓ Skip to main content

Clinical practice

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
354 Mendeley
Title
Clinical practice
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, September 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00431-011-1547-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Myriam Van Winckel, Saskia Vande Velde, Ruth De Bruyne, Stephanie Van Biervliet

Abstract

The aim of this review is to give insight on the benefits and risks of vegetarianism, with special emphasis on vegetarian child nutrition. This eating pattern excluding meat and fish is being adopted by a growing number of people. A vegetarian diet has been shown to be associated with lower mortality of ischaemic heart disease and lower prevalence of obesity. Growth in children on a vegetarian diet including dairy has been shown to be similar to omnivorous peers. Although vegetarianism in adolescents is associated with eating disorders, there is no proof of a causal relation, as the eating disorder generally precedes the exclusion of meat from the diet. A well-balanced lacto-ovo-vegetarian diet, including dairy products, can satisfy all nutritional needs of the growing child. In contrast, a vegan diet, excluding all animal food sources, has at least to be supplemented with vitamin B(12), with special attention to adequate intakes of calcium and zinc and energy-dense foods containing enough high-quality protein for young children. The more restricted the diet and the younger the child, the greater the risk for deficiencies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 354 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 346 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 88 25%
Student > Master 75 21%
Other 21 6%
Student > Postgraduate 18 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 4%
Other 55 16%
Unknown 82 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 104 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 61 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 4%
Psychology 12 3%
Other 44 12%
Unknown 92 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2023.
All research outputs
#912,123
of 25,692,343 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#62
of 4,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,609
of 138,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,692,343 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 138,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.