↓ Skip to main content

Near peer teaching in general practice

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Near peer teaching in general practice
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, December 2018
DOI 10.3399/bjgp19x700361
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harish Thampy, Hugh Alberti, Liza Kirtchuk, Joe Rosenthal

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Other 5 12%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 9 21%
Unknown 10 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 62%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 11 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2020.
All research outputs
#15,093,558
of 24,397,600 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#3,246
of 4,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,882
of 445,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#68
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,397,600 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,545 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.