| Title |
Self-perceived burden mediates the relationship between self-stigma and quality of life among Chinese American breast cancer survivors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Supportive Care in Cancer, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00520-018-4630-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nelson C. Y. Yeung, Qian Lu, Winnie W. S. Mak |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Librarian | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 24 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 22% |
| Psychology | 13 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 24 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2022.
All research outputs
#597,910
of 23,578,176 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#36
of 4,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,856
of 440,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#1
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,176 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,732 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.