You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Early-Warning Signals of Individual Tree Mortality Based on Annual Radial Growth
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2018.01964 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maxime Cailleret, Vasilis Dakos, Steven Jansen, Elisabeth M. R. Robert, Tuomas Aakala, Mariano M. Amoroso, Joe A. Antos, Christof Bigler, Harald Bugmann, Marco Caccianaga, Jesus-Julio Camarero, Paolo Cherubini, Marie R. Coyea, Katarina Čufar, Adrian J. Das, Hendrik Davi, Guillermo Gea-Izquierdo, Sten Gillner, Laurel J. Haavik, Henrik Hartmann, Ana-Maria Hereş, Kevin R. Hultine, Pavel Janda, Jeffrey M. Kane, Viachelsav I. Kharuk, Thomas Kitzberger, Tamir Klein, Tom Levanic, Juan-Carlos Linares, Fabio Lombardi, Harri Mäkinen, Ilona Mészáros, Juha M. Metsaranta, Walter Oberhuber, Andreas Papadopoulos, Any Mary Petritan, Brigitte Rohner, Gabriel Sangüesa-Barreda, Jeremy M. Smith, Amanda B. Stan, Dejan B. Stojanovic, Maria-Laura Suarez, Miroslav Svoboda, Volodymyr Trotsiuk, Ricardo Villalba, Alana R. Westwood, Peter H. Wyckoff, Jordi Martínez-Vilalta |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 5 | 22% |
| United States | 4 | 17% |
| France | 2 | 9% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 9% |
| Germany | 2 | 9% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Portugal | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 3 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 61% |
| Scientists | 8 | 35% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 257 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 61 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 12% |
| Other | 12 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 36 | 14% |
| Unknown | 58 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 78 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 63 | 25% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 13 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 2% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 6% |
| Unknown | 79 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,690,195
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#571
of 24,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,722
of 451,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#16
of 442 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,949 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 442 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.