↓ Skip to main content

Robbing Peter to pay Paul: replacing unintended cross-taxa conflicts with intentional tradeoffs by moving from piecemeal to integrated fisheries bycatch management

Overview of attention for article published in Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
Title
Robbing Peter to pay Paul: replacing unintended cross-taxa conflicts with intentional tradeoffs by moving from piecemeal to integrated fisheries bycatch management
Published in
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11160-019-09547-1
Authors

Eric Gilman, Milani Chaloupka, Laurent Dagorn, Martin Hall, Alistair Hobday, Michael Musyl, Tony Pitcher, Francois Poisson, Victor Restrepo, Petri Suuronen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 99 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 30 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 27%
Environmental Science 21 21%
Engineering 3 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 37 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,712,342
of 25,440,205 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#140
of 640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,176
of 446,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,440,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.