You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Outcomes of elderly patients aged 80 and over with symptomatic, severe aortic stenosis: impact of patient's choice of refusing aortic valve replacement on survival
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, March 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1093/qjmed/hcn052 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
P. Kojodjojo, N. Gohil, D. Barker, P. Youssefi, T.V. Salukhe, A. Choong, M. Koa-Wing, J. Bayliss, D.R. Hackett, M.A. Khan |
| Abstract |
Aortic valve replacement (AVR) can be performed safely in selected elderly patients with aortic stenosis (AS). However, the survival benefits of AVR over conservative treatment have not been convincingly demonstrated in AS patients aged above 80. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Greece | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 66 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 21% |
| Researcher | 9 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 24% |
| Unknown | 12 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 70% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Psychology | 1 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 16 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2008.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from QJM: An International Journal of Medicine
#1,672
of 2,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,334
of 95,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from QJM: An International Journal of Medicine
#23
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,435 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.