| Title |
MHD forced convection of MWCNT–Fe3O4/water hybrid nanofluid in a partially heated τ-shaped channel using LBM
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10973-018-7788-4 |
| Authors |
Yuan Ma, Rasul Mohebbi, M. M. Rashidi, Zhigang Yang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 42% |
| Other | 3 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
| Researcher | 1 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 5 | 26% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 5% |
| Energy | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2019.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry
#926
of 1,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,605
of 359,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry
#9
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,291 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.