| Title |
Systematic evaluation of C. elegans lincRNAs with CRISPR knockout mutants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13059-018-1619-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shuai Wei, He Chen, Emmanuel Enoch Dzakah, Bin Yu, Xiaolin Wang, Tao Fu, Jingxin Li, Lei Liu, Shucheng Fang, Weihong Liu, Ge Shan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 18% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Poland | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Israel | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 53% |
| Scientists | 15 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 28% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 11 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,114,794
of 25,718,113 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#800
of 4,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,770
of 449,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#19
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,718,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,505 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.