↓ Skip to main content

Relevant findings on postmortem CT and postmortem MRI in hanging, ligature strangulation and manual strangulation and their additional value compared to autopsy – a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Relevant findings on postmortem CT and postmortem MRI in hanging, ligature strangulation and manual strangulation and their additional value compared to autopsy – a systematic review
Published in
Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12024-018-0070-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dominic Gascho, Jakob Heimer, Carlo Tappero, Sarah Schaerli

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 17%
Student > Master 6 12%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 17 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 52%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 17 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2023.
All research outputs
#3,067,302
of 24,262,436 outputs
Outputs from Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology
#84
of 1,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,716
of 446,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology
#3
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,262,436 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.