| Title |
Speckle tracking echocardiography in healthy children: comparison between the QLAB by Philips and the EchoPAC by General Electric
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10554-018-01516-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pascal Amedro, Charlene Bredy, Sophie Guillaumont, Gregoire De La Villeon, Lucie Gamon, Kathleen Lavastre, Albano C. Meli, Sylvain Richard, Olivier Cazorla, Alain Lacampagne, Thibault Mura, Marie Vincenti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 29% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 14% |
| Mexico | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 8 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 30% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Unknown | 10 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2019.
All research outputs
#6,923,873
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
#210
of 2,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,985
of 446,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
#6
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,012 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.