| Title |
Identifying knowledge gaps in the research and management of invasive species in India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biologia, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2478/s11756-018-00186-8 |
| Authors |
Ninad Avinash Mungi, Monica Kaushik, Nitya Prakash Mohanty, Rajat Rastogi, J. Antony Johnson, Qamar Qureshi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 3 | 20% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 53% |
| Scientists | 6 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 22 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 27% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 20 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2020.
All research outputs
#659,965
of 24,780,938 outputs
Outputs from Biologia
#6
of 431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,485
of 448,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biologia
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,780,938 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.