You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How Cross-Validation Can Go Wrong and What to Do About It
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Political Analysis, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1017/pan.2018.39 |
| Authors |
Marcel Neunhoeffer, Sebastian Sternberg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 4 | 31% |
| United States | 4 | 31% |
| Estonia | 1 | 8% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 9 | 69% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Researcher | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 12 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 15 | 32% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 16 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,691,187
of 24,987,787 outputs
Outputs from Political Analysis
#170
of 549 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,056
of 448,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Political Analysis
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,987,787 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 549 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.