↓ Skip to main content

Lysosomes and oxidative stress in aging and apoptosis

Overview of attention for article published in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA), January 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
246 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lysosomes and oxidative stress in aging and apoptosis
Published in
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA), January 2008
DOI 10.1016/j.bbagen.2008.01.009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tino Kurz, Alexei Terman, Bertil Gustafsson, Ulf T. Brunk

Abstract

The lysosomal compartment consists of numerous acidic vesicles (pH approximately 4-5) that constantly fuse and divide. It receives a large number of hydrolases from the trans-Golgi network, while their substrates arrive from both the cell's outside (heterophagy) and inside (autophagy). Many macromolecules under degradation inside lysosomes contain iron that, when released in labile form, makes lysosomes sensitive to oxidative stress. The magnitude of generated lysosomal destabilization determines if reparative autophagy, apoptosis, or necrosis will follow. Apart from being an essential turnover process, autophagy is also a mechanism for cells to repair inflicted damage, and to survive temporary starvation. The inevitable diffusion of hydrogen peroxide into iron-rich lysosomes causes the slow oxidative formation of lipofuscin in long-lived postmitotic cells, where it finally occupies a substantial part of the volume of the lysosomal compartment. This seems to result in a misdirection of lysosomal enzymes away from autophagosomes, resulting in depressed autophagy and the accumulation of malfunctioning mitochondria and proteins with consequent cellular dysfunction. This scenario might put aging into the category of autophagy disorders.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Italy 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 132 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 23%
Researcher 23 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Student > Master 11 8%
Other 11 8%
Other 40 28%
Unknown 14 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 12%
Chemistry 8 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 20 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2008.
All research outputs
#17,302,400
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)
#16,812
of 19,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,484
of 170,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)
#92
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,230 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.