↓ Skip to main content

From event logs to goals: a systematic literature review of goal-oriented process mining

Overview of attention for article published in Requirements Engineering, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
Title
From event logs to goals: a systematic literature review of goal-oriented process mining
Published in
Requirements Engineering, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00766-018-00308-3
Authors

Mahdi Ghasemi, Daniel Amyot

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 180 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Researcher 9 5%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 56 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 67 37%
Engineering 19 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 15 8%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Design 2 1%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 59 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2021.
All research outputs
#15,409,382
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Requirements Engineering
#136
of 199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,353
of 435,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Requirements Engineering
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.