| Title |
Bisphosphonates in the treatment of Charcot neuroarthropathy: a double-blind randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Diabetologia, November 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s001250100008 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
E. B. Jude, P. L. Selby, J. Burgess, P. Lilleystone, E. B. Mawer, S. R. Page, M. Donohoe, A. V. M. Foster, M. E. Edmonds, A. J. M. Boulton |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 105 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Professor | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 26 | 25% |
| Unknown | 24 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 49% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 28 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2006.
All research outputs
#8,394,292
of 25,081,505 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#3,118
of 5,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,332
of 45,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#15
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,081,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,337 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.5. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 45,674 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.