| Title |
Clinical effect of successful reperfusion in patients presenting with NIHSS < 8: data from the BEYOND-SWIFT registry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Neurology, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00415-018-09172-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Johannes Kaesmacher, Panagiotis Chaloulos-Iakovidis, Leonidas Panos, Pasquale Mordasini, Mirjam R. Heldner, Christoph C. Kurmann, Patrik Michel, Steven D. Hajdu, Marc Ribo, Manuel Requena, Christian Maegerlein, Benjamin Friedrich, Vincent Costalat, Amel Benali, Laurent Pierot, Matthias Gawlitza, Joanna Schaafsma, Vitor Mendes Pereira, Jan Gralla, Urs Fischer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 21% |
| Unknown | 19 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 28 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2019.
All research outputs
#20,549,510
of 23,122,481 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#4,037
of 4,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#371,967
of 438,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#62
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,122,481 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.