| Title |
Comparative population genomics confirms little population structure in two commercially targeted carcharhinid sharks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Marine Biology, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00227-018-3454-4 |
| Authors |
Claudia Junge, Stephen C. Donnellan, Charlie Huveneers, Corey J. A. Bradshaw, Alexis Simon, Michael Drew, Clinton Duffy, Grant Johnson, Geremy Cliff, Matias Braccini, Scott C. Cutmore, Paul Butcher, Rory McAuley, Vic Peddemors, Paul Rogers, Bronwyn M. Gillanders |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 14 | 45% |
| Canada | 3 | 10% |
| United States | 3 | 10% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 7 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 65% |
| Scientists | 11 | 35% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 15% |
| Researcher | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 37% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 16 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2019.
All research outputs
#2,094,585
of 25,083,571 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#243
of 3,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,564
of 449,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#9
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,083,571 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.