| Title |
A comparison of epinephrine and norepinephrine in critically ill patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, July 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-008-1219-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John A. Myburgh, Alisa Higgins, Alina Jovanovska, Jeffrey Lipman, Naresh Ramakrishnan, John Santamaria, the CAT Study investigators |
| Abstract |
To determine whether there was a difference between epinephrine and norepinephrine in achieving a mean arterial pressure (MAP) goal in intensive care (ICU) patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 4 | 22% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 373 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| South Africa | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 349 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 64 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 53 | 14% |
| Researcher | 50 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 6% |
| Other | 86 | 23% |
| Unknown | 66 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 250 | 67% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 19 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 2% |
| Engineering | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 4% |
| Unknown | 68 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2023.
All research outputs
#795,744
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#751
of 5,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,600
of 101,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.