↓ Skip to main content

The Influence of Clinical Information in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Melanocytic Skin Neoplasms

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Influence of Clinical Information in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Melanocytic Skin Neoplasms
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0005375
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerardo Ferrara, Zsolt Argenyi, Giuseppe Argenziano, Rino Cerio, Lorenzo Cerroni, Arturo Di Blasi, Elisa A. A. Feudale, Caterina M. Giorgio, Cesare Massone, Oscar Nappi, Carlo Tomasini, Carmelo Urso, Iris Zalaudek, Harald Kittler, H. Peter Soyer

Abstract

We tested the relevance of clinical information in the histopathologic evaluation of melanocytic skin neoplasm (MSN).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 37 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 13%
Student > Master 5 13%
Professor 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 9 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Computer Science 1 3%
Decision Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2022.
All research outputs
#13,816,685
of 23,414,653 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#112,871
of 200,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,688
of 93,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#415
of 513 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,414,653 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 200,396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 513 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.