| Title |
Early Adoption of an Improved Household Energy System in Urban Rwanda
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
EcoHealth, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10393-018-1391-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pamela Jagger, Ipsita Das, Sudhanshu Handa, Leena A. Nylander-French, Karin B. Yeatts |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 33% |
| Djibouti | 1 | 11% |
| Rwanda | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 121 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 15% |
| Researcher | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 39 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 13 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 33 | 27% |
| Unknown | 42 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,708,004
of 25,271,884 outputs
Outputs from EcoHealth
#157
of 756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,083
of 449,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EcoHealth
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,271,884 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.