| Title |
Testing the diagnostic accuracy of [18F]FDG-PET in discriminating spinal- and bulbar-onset amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00259-018-4246-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arianna Sala, Leonardo Iaccarino, Piercarlo Fania, Emilia G. Vanoli, Federico Fallanca, Caterina Pagnini, Chiara Cerami, Andrea Calvo, Antonio Canosa, Marco Pagani, Adriano Chiò, Angelina Cistaro, Daniela Perani |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Unknown | 11 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 10 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 16 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2020.
All research outputs
#3,045,615
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#280
of 3,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,603
of 440,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#5
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.