Title |
End-of-life practices in 282 intensive care units: data from the SAPS 3 database
|
---|---|
Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, October 2008
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00134-008-1310-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Élie Azoulay, Barbara Metnitz, Charles L. Sprung, Jean-François Timsit, François Lemaire, Peter Bauer, Benoît Schlemmer, Rui Moreno, Philipp Metnitz, on behalf of the SAPS 3 investigators |
Abstract |
To report incidence and characteristics of decisions to forgo life-sustaining therapies (DFLSTs) in the 282 ICUs who contributed to the SAPS3 database. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 3 | 3% |
Greece | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 112 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 27 | 23% |
Other | 14 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 10% |
Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 8% |
Other | 23 | 19% |
Unknown | 20 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 74 | 63% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Engineering | 2 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 6% |
Unknown | 27 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2009.
All research outputs
#15,240,835
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#3,992
of 4,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,378
of 90,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#23
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.