| Title |
Long-Term Outcomes After Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Using the Second-Generation Cryoballoon Final Results From STOP AF Post-Approval Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.11.006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bradley P. Knight, Paul G. Novak, Robert Sangrigoli, Jean Champagne, Marc Dubuc, Stuart W. Adler, J. Thomas Svinarich, Vidal Essebag, Robert Hokanson, Fred Kueffer, Sandeep K. Jain, Roy M. John, Moussa Mansour, STOP AF PAS Investigators, Bradley Knight, Paul Novak, Robert Sangrigoli, Jean Champagne, Marc Dubuc, Vidal Essebag, Stuart Adler, Sandeep Jain, Thomas Svinarich, Roy John, Evan Lockwood, Gaurang Gandhi, Marc Wish, Matthew Levy, Safwat Gassis, Eric Johnson, John Seger, Stephen Remole, H. Wade Collins, Jess Oren, Jason Andrade, Matthew Bernabei, Ahmed Osman, Richard Wu, Andrew Merliss, Moussa Mansour, William Miles, Wilber Su, Jacob Blatt, Hanscy Seide, Giuliano Becker, Joseph Souza, Michael Lloyd, Craig Cameron, James Baker, Raman Mitra, Douglas Packer, Christopher McLeod, Brian DeVille, Steven Compton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 32% |
| Turkey | 3 | 12% |
| Australia | 2 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Lebanon | 1 | 4% |
| Denmark | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 28% |
| Scientists | 5 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 17% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 22% |
| Unknown | 19 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 47% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 26 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,564,769
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#352
of 1,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,514
of 444,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#11
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.