| Title |
Development of an agent-based model to assess the impact of substandard and falsified anti-malarials: Uganda case study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12936-018-2628-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sachiko Ozawa, Daniel R. Evans, Colleen R. Higgins, Sarah K. Laing, Phyllis Awor |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nigeria | 2 | 13% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 13% |
| Uganda | 1 | 7% |
| Guatemala | 1 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 73% |
| Scientists | 3 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 102 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 8 | 8% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 41 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 19% |
| Unknown | 38 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2019.
All research outputs
#1,296,065
of 24,400,706 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#203
of 5,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,037
of 446,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#3
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,400,706 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.