| Title |
The handling of evidence in national and local policy making: a case study of alcohol industry actor strategies regarding data on on-premise trading hours and violence in Norway
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-018-6348-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ingeborg Rossow, Jim McCambridge |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 15% |
| Ireland | 4 | 8% |
| United States | 4 | 8% |
| Norway | 3 | 6% |
| Australia | 3 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 3 | 6% |
| Kenya | 2 | 4% |
| Sweden | 2 | 4% |
| San Marino | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 19% |
| Unknown | 12 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 63% |
| Scientists | 10 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 14 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 11 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,208,658
of 25,292,378 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,341
of 16,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,997
of 450,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#34
of 301 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,292,378 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,941 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 301 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.