| Title |
The impact of repeated vaccination on influenza vaccine effectiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-018-1239-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lauren C. Ramsay, Sarah A. Buchan, Robert G. Stirling, Benjamin J. Cowling, Shuo Feng, Jeffrey C. Kwong, Bryna F. Warshawsky |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 126 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 18 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 6% |
| United States | 5 | 4% |
| Cyprus | 1 | <1% |
| Uganda | 1 | <1% |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| El Salvador | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 85 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 115 | 91% |
| Scientists | 8 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 123 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Unknown | 34 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 19% |
| Unknown | 42 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 127. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2023.
All research outputs
#333,710
of 25,746,891 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#275
of 4,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,361
of 449,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#4
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,746,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.