↓ Skip to main content

An Empirical Test of a Clinical Metacognitive Model of Rumination and Depression

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Therapy and Research, June 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
421 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
343 Mendeley
Title
An Empirical Test of a Clinical Metacognitive Model of Rumination and Depression
Published in
Cognitive Therapy and Research, June 2003
DOI 10.1023/a:1023962332399
Authors

Costas Papageorgiou, Adrian Wells

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 343 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 327 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 73 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 42 12%
Researcher 27 8%
Student > Bachelor 26 8%
Other 64 19%
Unknown 57 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 209 61%
Neuroscience 14 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 3%
Social Sciences 8 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Other 24 7%
Unknown 71 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2020.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Therapy and Research
#466
of 1,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,501
of 53,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Therapy and Research
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,015 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.