↓ Skip to main content

Association of left atrial volume index and all-cause mortality in patients referred for routine cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a multicenter study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
28 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Association of left atrial volume index and all-cause mortality in patients referred for routine cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a multicenter study
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12968-018-0517-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohammad A. Khan, Eric Y. Yang, Yang Zhan, Robert M. Judd, Wenyaw Chan, Faisal Nabi, John F. Heitner, Raymond J. Kim, Igor Klem, Sherif F. Nagueh, Dipan J. Shah

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Other 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Researcher 5 9%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 26 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Materials Science 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 30 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,740,509
of 25,523,622 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#56
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,986
of 446,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#2
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,523,622 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.