↓ Skip to main content

都市鉄道の時差通勤施策における抽選型報奨金制度の有効性

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. D3 (Infrastructure Planning and Management), January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
都市鉄道の時差通勤施策における抽選型報奨金制度の有効性
Published in
Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. D3 (Infrastructure Planning and Management), January 2015
DOI 10.2208/jscejipm.71.i_523
Authors

川崎 智也, 轟 朝幸, 小林 聡一

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2019.
All research outputs
#20,660,571
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. D3 (Infrastructure Planning and Management)
#123
of 138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,662
of 359,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. D3 (Infrastructure Planning and Management)
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.