| Title |
Variation in Valuation: How Research Groups Accumulate Credibility in Four Epistemic Cultures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Minerva, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11024-018-09366-x |
| Authors |
Laurens K. Hessels, Thomas Franssen, Wout Scholten, Sarah de Rijcke |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 17% |
| Italy | 1 | 8% |
| Ireland | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 42% |
| Scientists | 3 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 21% |
| Researcher | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 15 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 25 | 45% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2021.
All research outputs
#3,426,718
of 24,831,063 outputs
Outputs from Minerva
#91
of 422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,787
of 448,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Minerva
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,831,063 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.