↓ Skip to main content

An investigation of auditory contagious yawning

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#48 of 974)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
Title
An investigation of auditory contagious yawning
Published in
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, September 2009
DOI 10.3758/cabn.9.3.335
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen R. Arnott, Anthony Singhal, Melvyn A. Goodale

Abstract

Despite a widespread familiarity with the often compelling urge to yawn after perceiving someone else yawn, an understanding of the neural mechanism underlying contagious yawning remains incomplete. In the present auditory fMRI study, listeners used a 4-point scale to indicate how much they felt like yawning following the presentation of a yawn, breath, or scrambled yawn sound. Not only were yawn sounds given significantly higher ratings, a trait positively correlated with each individual's empathy measure, but relative to control stimuli, random effects analyses revealed enhanced hemodynamic activity in the right posterior inferior frontal gyrus (pIFG) in response to hearing yawns. Moreover, pIFG activity was greatest for yawn stimuli associated with high as opposed to low yawn ratings and for control sounds associated with equally high yawn ratings. These results support a relationship between contagious yawning and empathy and provide evidence for pIFG involvement in contagious yawning. A supplemental figure for this study may be downloaded from http://cabn.psychonomic-journals.org/content/supplemental.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 110 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 15%
Researcher 17 15%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 14 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 44 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 18%
Neuroscience 12 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 21 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,140,394
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
#48
of 974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,091
of 94,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them