You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cognitive-behavioral family treatment for childhood obsessive-compulsive disorder: A 7-year follow-up study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Anxiety Disorders, June 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.06.009 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emily Marie McHugh O’Leary, Paula Barrett, Krister W. Fjermestad |
| Abstract |
This study evaluated the long-term durability of individual and group cognitive-behavioral family-based therapy (CBFT) for childhood obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Thirty-eight participants (age 13-24 years) from a randomized controlled trial of individual or group CBFT for childhood OCD were assessed 7 years post-treatment. Diagnostic, symptom severity interviews and self-report measures of OCD, anxiety, and depression were administered. Seven years after treatment, 79% of participants from individual therapy and 95% from group therapy had no diagnosis of OCD. These results are near identical to results found at 12 and 18 months follow-ups of the same sample. No significant differences were found between treatment conditions, self-reports of symptom severity, except that depressive symptoms were significantly more pronounced for individual treatment condition, and those in the older age group (19-24 years of age). Results suggest that CBFT for obsessive-compulsive disorder is effective 7 years post-treatment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 16% |
| Unknown | 19 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 77 | 60% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 26 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2016.
All research outputs
#3,026,066
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Anxiety Disorders
#296
of 1,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,454
of 122,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Anxiety Disorders
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,699 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.