↓ Skip to main content

Neurological outcome of long-term glioblastoma survivors

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Neurological outcome of long-term glioblastoma survivors
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, June 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11060-009-9946-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas F. Hottinger, Hannah Yoon, Lisa M. DeAngelis, Lauren E. Abrey

Abstract

Extended survival of 3 or more years is rare in patients with glioblastoma (GBM) but is becoming more common. Clinical outcome has not been well studied. We reviewed GBM patients at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center between 2001 and 2003 who were seen for two or more visits. Patient characteristics and long-term clinical outcomes were reviewed for patients who had survived 3 or more years following diagnosis. Thirty-nine (11%) of 352 GBM patients were identified as long-term survivors. Median survival was 9.15 years (range: 3-18 years). Median age was 47 years (range: 16-69); 13% were 65 years or older. Median KPS was 90 (range: 50-100). One long-term survivor underwent biopsy alone; 19 patients each had either complete or subtotal resection. All received focal radiotherapy (RT) with a median dose of 5940 cGy; 18% received concurrent temozolomide. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 35 (90%). Twelve patients (31%) remained in continuous remission. Twenty-seven had tumor progression a median of 29.2 months after diagnosis (range: 1.2-167 months); 18 had multiple relapses. Median KPS at last follow-up was 70 (range: 40-100); 85% of long-term survivors had at least one significant neurologic deficit. Eleven (28%) had clinically significant RT-induced leukoencephalopathy, 9 (23%) developed RT necrosis and 9 (23%) treatment-related strokes. Treatment-related complications occurred a median of 2.7 years from diagnosis (range: 0.9-11.5 years). Long-term survivors remain rare, but are found across all age groups despite multiple recurrences; clinically significant delayed complications of treatment are common.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 81 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Other 8 10%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 22 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 42%
Psychology 9 11%
Neuroscience 7 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 22 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2013.
All research outputs
#1,608,284
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#76
of 2,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,212
of 110,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,954 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.