You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lipid Formulations of Amphotericin B Significantly Improve Outcome in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients with Central Nervous System Cryptococcosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Infectious Diseases, December 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1086/647948 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hsin-Yun Sun, Barbara D. Alexander, Olivier Lortholary, Francoise Dromer, Graeme N. Forrest, G. Marshall Lyon, Jyoti Somani, Krishan L. Gupta, Ramon del Busto, Timothy L. Pruett, Costi D. Sifri, Ajit P. Limaye, George T. John, Goran B. Klintmalm, Kenneth Pursell, Valentina Stosor, Michelle I. Morris, Lorraine A. Dowdy, Patricia Munoz, Andre C. Kalil, Julia Garcia-Diaz, Susan Orloff, Andrew A. House, Sally Houston, Dannah Wray, Shirish Huprikar, Leonard B. Johnson, Atul Humar, Raymund R. Razonable, Shahid Husain, Nina Singh |
| Abstract |
Whether outcome of central nervous system (CNS) cryptococcosis in solid organ transplant recipients treated with lipid formulations of amphotericin B is different from the outcome of the condition treated with amphotericin B deoxycholate (AmBd) is not known. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 60 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 13 | 20% |
| Researcher | 9 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 11% |
| Professor | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 22% |
| Unknown | 10 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 48% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 11 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2009.
All research outputs
#15,240,835
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#12,686
of 15,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,280
of 164,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#78
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,734 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.