You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Accuracy of clinical signs, SEP, and EEG in predicting outcome of hypoxic coma: a meta-analysis.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neurology, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181cff761 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Y. C. Lee, T. G. Phan, D. J. Jolley, H. C. Castley, D. A. Ingram, D. C. Reutens |
| Abstract |
Accurate prediction of neurologic outcome after hypoxic coma is important. Previous systematic reviews have not used summary statistics to summarize and formally compare the accuracy of different prognostic tests. We therefore used summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) and cluster regression methods to compare motor and pupillary responses with sensory evoked potential (SEP) and EEG in predicting outcome after hypoxic coma. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 87 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 18 | 19% |
| Researcher | 18 | 19% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 20 | 22% |
| Unknown | 8 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 61% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 11% |
| Psychology | 5 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2010.
All research outputs
#17,289,387
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Neurology
#16,529
of 21,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,428
of 102,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurology
#75
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.7. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.