↓ Skip to main content

A Simple Score to Predict the Outcome of Severe Malaria in Adults

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Infectious Diseases, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Simple Score to Predict the Outcome of Severe Malaria in Adults
Published in
Clinical Infectious Diseases, March 2010
DOI 10.1086/649928
Pubmed ID
Authors

Josh Hanson, Sue J. Lee, Sanjib Mohanty, M.A. Faiz, Nicholas M. Anstey, Prakay kaew Charunwatthana, Emran Bin Yunus, Saroj K. Mishra, Emiliana Tjitra, Ric N. Price, Ridwanur Rahman, Francois Nosten, Ye Htut, Gofranul Hoque, Tran Thi Hong Chau, Nguyen Hoan Phu, Tran Tinh Hien, Nicholas J. White, Nicholas P. J. Day, Arjen M. Dondorp

Abstract

World Health Organization treatment guidelines recommend that adults with severe malaria be admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU). However, ICU facilities are limited in the resource-poor settings where most malaria occurs. Identification of patients at greater risk of complications may facilitate their triage and resource allocation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Belgium 2 1%
Indonesia 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Mozambique 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 128 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 15%
Student > Master 15 11%
Other 12 8%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Other 30 21%
Unknown 25 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 47%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 3%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 28 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2016.
All research outputs
#6,377,613
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#7,769
of 15,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,228
of 93,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#55
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,734 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.