| Title |
Barriers and opportunities in the translation of mobile phone and social media interventions between research and health promotion practice in Australia: a qualitative study of expert perspectives
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-018-0406-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cassandra J. C. Wright, Joanna Schwarzman, Paul M. Dietze, Belinda Crockett, Megan S. C. Lim |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 17% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 8% |
| Colombia | 1 | 8% |
| Ireland | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 103 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 38 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 9% |
| Psychology | 7 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 18% |
| Unknown | 38 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2019.
All research outputs
#3,862,191
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#546
of 1,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,056
of 440,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#28
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.