| Title |
A comparative assessment of the clinical efficacy of intranasal desmopressin spray and diclofenac in the treatment of renal colic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Urolithiasis, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00240-010-0354-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Santosh Kumar, Nimai Charan Behera, Debansu Sarkar, Seema Prasad, Arup Kumar Mandal, S. K. Singh |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 31% |
| Other | 3 | 19% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 69% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 13% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2018.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Urolithiasis
#230
of 716 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,715
of 192,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Urolithiasis
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 716 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.