| Title |
Physiological comparison of three spontaneous breathing trials in difficult-to-wean patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-010-1870-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Belén Cabello, Arnaud W. Thille, Ferran Roche-Campo, Laurent Brochard, Francisco J. Gómez, Jordi Mancebo |
| Abstract |
To compare cardiovascular and respiratory responses to different spontaneous breathing trials (SBT) in difficult-to-wean patients using T-piece and pressure support ventilation (PSV) with or without positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 2% |
| Colombia | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 149 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 15% |
| Other | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 40 | 25% |
| Unknown | 29 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 109 | 67% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 31 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2022.
All research outputs
#6,484,996
of 23,845,863 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,685
of 5,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,614
of 97,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#11
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,845,863 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.5. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.