↓ Skip to main content

Trends in neonicotinoid pesticide residues in food and water in the United States, 1999–2015

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Health, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
17 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
155 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
230 Mendeley
Title
Trends in neonicotinoid pesticide residues in food and water in the United States, 1999–2015
Published in
Environmental Health, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12940-018-0441-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hillary A. Craddock, Dina Huang, Paul C. Turner, Lesliam Quirós-Alcalá, Devon C. Payne-Sturges

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 230 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 17%
Student > Bachelor 25 11%
Student > Master 24 10%
Researcher 23 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 29 13%
Unknown 79 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 15%
Environmental Science 26 11%
Chemistry 16 7%
Engineering 12 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Other 28 12%
Unknown 105 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#579,262
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#161
of 1,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,151
of 450,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#7
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.