| Title |
Back pain, disability, and radiographic vertebral fracture in European women: a prospective study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Osteoporosis International, May 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00198-004-1615-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
T. W. O’Neill, W. Cockerill, C. Matthis, H. H. Raspe, M. Lunt, C. Cooper, D. Banzer, J. B. Cannata, M. Naves, B. Felsch, D. Felsenberg, J. Janott, O. Johnell, J. A. Kanis, G. Kragl, A. Lopes Vaz, G. Lyritis, P. Masaryk, G. Poor, D. M. Reid, W. Reisinger, C. Scheidt-Nave, J. J. Stepan, C. J. Todd, A. D. Woolf, J. Reeve, A. J. Silman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 53 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 20% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
| Professor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 24% |
| Unknown | 10 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 37% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 15 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2019.
All research outputs
#7,472,296
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#1,343
of 3,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,897
of 58,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#10
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,615 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.