Title |
Gastric versus transpyloric feeding in severe traumatic brain injury: a prospective, randomized trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, May 2010
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00134-010-1908-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jose Acosta-Escribano, Miguel Fernández-Vivas, Teodoro Grau Carmona, Juan Caturla-Such, Miguel Garcia-Martinez, Ainhoa Menendez-Mainer, Manuel Solera-Suarez, José Sanchez-Payá |
Abstract |
To evaluate the efficacy of transpyloric feeding (TPF) compared with gastric feeding (GF) with regard to the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia in severe traumatic brain injury patients (TBI). |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | 1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 189 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 27 | 14% |
Researcher | 24 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 19 | 10% |
Other | 18 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 9% |
Other | 44 | 23% |
Unknown | 43 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 98 | 51% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
Psychology | 4 | 2% |
Other | 12 | 6% |
Unknown | 49 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2010.
All research outputs
#15,240,835
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#3,992
of 4,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,494
of 94,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#12
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.